Loading CHANGELOG.md +1 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ update the Unreleased link so that it compares against the latest release tag. --> ## [Unreleased] - Added documentation to lronaccal and lrowaccal to describe why there are negative DNs in I/F calibrated images. - Fixed so required files are reported instead of continuing without them. [#4038](https://github.com/USGS-Astrogeology/ISIS3/issues/4038) Loading isis/src/lro/apps/lronaccal/lronaccal.xml +70 −25 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ <description> <p> lronaccal performs radiometric corrections to images acquired by the Narrow Angle Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. The LRO NAC camera will make observations simulteously with the HiRise camera. Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. </p> <p> Loading Loading @@ -46,6 +45,52 @@ image pixels. </p> <p> The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise. </p> <p> The calibration equation is: <pre> reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre> Where: <pre> ObservedDN = TrueDN + E E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0 TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre> </p> <p> Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative. Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near zero can result in negative DN values. </p> <p> Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative random noise value. </p> <p> Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero. For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for that target TrueDN = 0. </p> </description> <history> Loading isis/src/lro/apps/lrowaccal/lrowaccal.xml +49 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -149,6 +149,54 @@ </pre> If TEMPRATUREFILE is not set, the constants are loaded from $lro/calibration/WAC_TempratureConstants.????.pvl </p> <p> The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise. </p> <p> The calibration equation is: <pre> reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre> Where: <pre> ObservedDN = TrueDN + E E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0 TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre> </p> <p> Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative. Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near zero can result in negative DN values. </p> <p> Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative random noise value. </p> <p> Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero. For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for that target TrueDN = 0. </p> </description> <category> Loading Loading
CHANGELOG.md +1 −0 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ update the Unreleased link so that it compares against the latest release tag. --> ## [Unreleased] - Added documentation to lronaccal and lrowaccal to describe why there are negative DNs in I/F calibrated images. - Fixed so required files are reported instead of continuing without them. [#4038](https://github.com/USGS-Astrogeology/ISIS3/issues/4038) Loading
isis/src/lro/apps/lronaccal/lronaccal.xml +70 −25 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -9,8 +9,7 @@ <description> <p> lronaccal performs radiometric corrections to images acquired by the Narrow Angle Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. The LRO NAC camera will make observations simulteously with the HiRise camera. Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft. </p> <p> Loading Loading @@ -46,6 +45,52 @@ image pixels. </p> <p> The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise. </p> <p> The calibration equation is: <pre> reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre> Where: <pre> ObservedDN = TrueDN + E E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0 TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre> </p> <p> Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative. Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near zero can result in negative DN values. </p> <p> Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative random noise value. </p> <p> Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero. For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for that target TrueDN = 0. </p> </description> <history> Loading
isis/src/lro/apps/lrowaccal/lrowaccal.xml +49 −1 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -149,6 +149,54 @@ </pre> If TEMPRATUREFILE is not set, the constants are loaded from $lro/calibration/WAC_TempratureConstants.????.pvl </p> <p> The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise. </p> <p> The calibration equation is: <pre> reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre> Where: <pre> ObservedDN = TrueDN + E E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0 TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre> </p> <p> Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative. Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near zero can result in negative DN values. </p> <p> Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative random noise value. </p> <p> Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero. For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for that target TrueDN = 0. </p> </description> <category> Loading