Unverified Commit b3d4edd4 authored by Stuart Sides's avatar Stuart Sides Committed by GitHub
Browse files

Added text to description by Dave Humm. Closes #3860 (#4107)

* Added text to description by Dave Humm. Closes #3860

* Forgot to add to the change log file

* Update after review

* Updated after review
parent 1cd4a2ad
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+1 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ update the Unreleased link so that it compares against the latest release tag.
-->

## [Unreleased]
 - Added documentation to lronaccal and lrowaccal to describe why there are negative DNs in I/F calibrated images.


- Fixed so required files are reported instead of continuing without them. [#4038](https://github.com/USGS-Astrogeology/ISIS3/issues/4038)
+70 −25
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -9,8 +9,7 @@
  <description>
    <p>
      lronaccal performs radiometric corrections to images acquired by the Narrow Angle
    Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft.  The LRO NAC camera
    will make observations simulteously with the HiRise camera.
      Camera aboard the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft.
    </p>

    <p>
@@ -46,6 +45,52 @@
      image pixels.
    </p>

    <p>
      The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, 
      the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in
      the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias
      is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean
      values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a 
      very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true 
      scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical 
      distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise
      has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise.
    </p>

    <p>
      The calibration equation is:
      <pre>  reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre>

        Where:
        <pre>
   ObservedDN = TrueDN + E
   E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0
   TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre>
     </p>

    <p>
      Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal
      is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are
      subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known
      distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of
      zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative.
      Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near
      zero can result in negative DN values.
    </p>

    <p>
      Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are
      pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative
      random noise value.
    </p>

    <p>
      Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero.
      For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative
      DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be
      negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for
      that target TrueDN = 0.
    </p>
  </description>

  <history>
+49 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -149,6 +149,54 @@
      </pre>
      If TEMPRATUREFILE is not set, the constants are loaded from $lro/calibration/WAC_TempratureConstants.????.pvl
    </p>

    <p>
      The DN level in an uncalibrated image is the sum of the true signal from the scene, 
      the bias, the dark current, and random noise in all 3 components. The random noise in
      the true signal and dark current is called shot noise and the random noise in the bias
      is called read noise. The true signal, bias, and dark current are defined as mean
      values so that if the random noise were averaged down to insignificance by taking a 
      very large number of images and averaging them, the resulting image would be the true 
      scene, bias, and dark current with no systematic error. That implies the statistical 
      distribution of the random noise has an average of zero, and therefore the random noise
      has both positive and negative values, except for the trivial case of zero random noise.
    </p>

    <p>
      The calibration equation is:
      <pre>  reportedDN = ObservedDN - MeanBias - DarkCurrent </pre>

        Where:
        <pre>
   ObservedDN = TrueDN + E
   E is a randomly sampled value from (mu, sigma^2) and mu=0
   TrueDN is the signal that would be reported in an idealized case of an instrument with zero noise.</pre>
     </p>

    <p>
      Let's look at the case of a calibrated image for which the true signal
      is zero, a dark image. In calibration the mean bias and dark current are
      subtracted. The random noise term is then randomly sampled from a known
      distribution with a mean of zero. Since the distribution has a mean of
      zero, values for the random noise can be positive or negative.
      Therefore, the addition of random noise to a pixel with true signal near
      zero can result in negative DN values.
    </p>

    <p>
      Negative reported DNs are possible when E < -1 * TrueDN. These are
      pixels in a very dark image that happen to have a strongly negative
      random noise value.
    </p>

    <p>
      Note: ObservedDN and TrueDN both must be greater than or equal to zero.
      For ObservedDN, it's because the hardware is not able to report negative
      DN values . For TrueDN, it's because radiance and reflectivity cannot be
      negative. The dimmest target is one that is completely dark, and for
      that target TrueDN = 0.
    </p>

  </description>

  <category>